Greater Flint Area Community Cultural Plan

 

Neighborhoods Task Force

Meeting - 3/17/04

 

Meeting on Issues, Obstacles and Opportunities

Present: Robin Maynard, Cindy Ornstein, Steve Wall, Jim Berry, Jennifer Hogan, Kate Fields, Lee Bell, Nicole Taylor

Additional Discussion about Vision

Bullet added to reflect input given to Robin by several committee members since the last meeting:

  • Community/Neighborhood Development/Redevelopment is planned and architecture, design standards, the arts and culture are incorporated into and linked to the planning and serve as a catalyst for implementation.


ITEMS IN BOLD BELOW WERE THOSE POINTS EMPHASIZED IN REPORT OUT

Issues/Current Climate

  • Increased unemployment
  • Migration of people out of the neighborhoods
  • Lack of time due to constraints of raising family, meeting basic needs
  • Disinvestment
  • Deterioration
  • Increasing poverty
  • People not viewing art as a way of life, part of their quality of life
  • Deterioration of schools as a place for experiencing art
  • Increased participation of folks in neighborhoods outside of their own homes
  • New focus on the importance of neighborhoods and neighborhood groups as important to the future of Flint
  • Increased sense of entrepreneurship—neighborhood people finding alternatives to maintaining and improving the neighborhood, circumventing government shortfalls
  • Asset-based approach to community improvement
  • Neighborhoods are recognizing the value and ease of improving the neighborhood aesthetics and beautification through community gardening projects—working on their own without local government
  • Neighborhood initiatives by themselves don’t have same status as “institutions” and so are seeking out partnerships to gain status and opportunities
  • Strength of neighborhood organizations (strong example is College and Cultural Neighborhood) - recognized as Centers of Strength; leads to partnerships and strong organizational structure
  • Establishment and capacity growth of non-profit CDC’s (community development corporations) working in partnership with neighborhood organizations and acting as sponsors of initiatives, accessing resources
  • Increased focus on planning in our community—getting its due that has not been case in the past—creates receptiveness to ideas
  • Schools closing (can be opportunity, due to availability of space)
  • Disconnectedness of renters to a neighborhood; lack of respect by visitors to neighborhoods (dumpers and casual)
  • Focal point of neighborhoods is shifting (schools closing, businesses and institutions changing, parks, churches)
  • Uncertainty of political circumstances/government
  • Decreased home ownership, increased slum rentals, accelerated rate of tax foreclosures and increased quantity of bank foreclosures (residential and commercial)—all trends in our community
  • Decreased government services
  • Increased deterioration of commercial corridors and parks, decreased investment
  • Some of local arts resources/artists goes underground or outside the community in times of drought (in face of all these problems)—remains unidentified
  • Perception of crime
  • Decreasing identification with a cultural group (heritage)

 

Obstacles

  • Limited funding/distribution of funding/access to funding
  • Infrastructure to access/spend dollars
  • Attitudes of funders
  • Capacity building needs of small organizations
  • Lack of awareness of how place/aesthetics improves quality of life
  • Lack of feeling that arts are central to improving quality of life (expendable, a frill)
  • Lack of art teachers in schools
  • Availability of time
  • Power structure/gatekeepers in our community
  • People’s identities are focused outside the local (will pay for a movie but not a local play)
  • Priority of addressing basic needs and deteriorating communities
  • Lack of reach of information/communication/networking into the neighborhoods
  • Overemphasis of sports

 

Opportunities

  • Current projects are building networks of artists and community members as well as awareness (such as Color Line Project)
  • Local talent and art institutions
  • Increased vacant space
  • Local funders who support the arts and neighborhood initiatives
  • Increased perception that the arts add value to the community
  • Use of Neighborhood Violence Prevention Collaborative as a model for disbursing funds to neighborhoods
  • Sloan Front Porch Project as means of involving community in Sesquicentenial
  • Positive community response to public and community art projects
  • Rising tide of arts and culture and focus on cultural diversity has increased attention on local arts and culture (national trend of art as cool)
  • Opportunity to remarket (reposition) Flint as arts place—create a new identity
  • Emerging and transitional arts scene in several neighborhoods (can act as models)

TO CULTURAL PLANNING HOME PAGE


This page and its contents Copyright 2003-4, The Greater Flint, MI Arts Council.
Send comments or suggestions to: gfac@prodigy.net